Animal Health Ireland (AHI) has come in for some negative comment recently. One of the big issues among farmers is the continuing costly BVD testing scheme. AHI chair Mike Magan accepts some responsibility.

He said: “Some farmers have said AHI were naive in expecting BVD to be sorted within a short time frame? Maybe we were, and, if so, I take responsibility for that naivety because I thought farmers would do the right thing when advised and get rid of identified diseased (PI calves) when advised. We now have the tools to complete the job and our most recent statistics show the retention of PI animals on farm is reducing.”

On the positive side, many farmers would say given the small number of full-time employees and small budget relative to some other organisations, AHI has done an incredible job on many herd health issues – CellCheck, Beefhealthcheck, CalfCare awareness etc.

Funding concerns

Ongoing and increasing AHI funding is another issue causing concern.

The AHI structure is that the main milk and meat processors make a contribution relative to their supply pool and the Government matches these funds.

So, effectively, farmers are not contributing directly. Or are they? Farmers will make the case that a disease levy is collected on product sold, so effectively they are contributing, or what else are those funds spent on? This is a question for the Department to answer. Surely the best use of these funds is to redirect them to herd health issues?

Our Department is right to invest in herd health – think of the billions in trade – they want the best possible international image. Think of the exports, not to mention the whole climate, emissions and sustainability issues because healthier animals have positive impact on all of these. Don’t forget herd health issues can cause serious stress at farm level, not to mention cost.

The benefit for Ireland to get rid of BVD is €102m every year

Recent consultations with stakeholders about setting up new Johne’s disease control programmes have also been met with very differing views.

Is the AHI trying to do too much? Should other programmes be shelved before it takes on a new conquest? What is the return for the farmer/industry on the existing programmes?

It is this last question on return on investment that I asked Magan to focus on.

He said: “The return is huge. BVD has a 10 to one return, and this return continues after the investment is made. The benefit for Ireland to get rid of BVD is €102m every year and this is an independently audited figure.

Viral diseases don’t patiently wait in line

Magan is quick to get back on the question about AHI taking on too much. He says viral diseases don’t patiently wait in line while we tackle them one by one so we need to work more broadly and ambition should not be considered a negative.

Beef farmers now receive information on how efficient their dosing and parasite control programmes are through liver and lung analysis on 65% of the national kill. This is a huge untapped resource. These results will give valuable information to farmers on the timing of dosing and if there resistance building up, or if dosing is necessary at all.

Johne’s – while some would say its not a problem for Ireland, doing nothing would appear foolhardy.

Pilot schemes have indicated that 25% of the national dairy herd have some Johne’s present. I understand an imminent expert report will suggest Johne’s prevalence will grow if left unmanaged. We need to give reassurance to international markets that we are managing on-farm challenges.

IBR

IBR is another one for which it is difficult to show a return directly, yet there are tangible measures. There are production cost implications at farm level, not to mention the international implications in terms of trade.

Magan said: “Bottom line – we can talk numbers all day, but independent analysis shows the ‘not yet completed’ BVD programme is delivering €66m per year already. Animal health issues should never be a trading barrier. Brexit could be a trade barrier to dairy exports out of Ireland, but let’s ensure animal health is never a barrier. The hand of the State is required and equally farm organisations must have ownership.

"Veterinary Ireland, the animal health industry, the universities, Teagasc – all play vital roles in Animal Health Ireland. Our link to ICBF is vital.”

Other questions

How do you think AHI is seen?

"Some will view us in an adversarial way but we want to guide the national herd to be healthier. That is our sole aim.

"However, farmers need to see what AHI is doing is delivering real benefit to them. If it’s not, then we might as well shut AHI down today.

"We need buy-in from all to achieve the vision for Ireland and internationally.

"In terms of stakeholders, if some don’t feel equal ownershp, then I’m quite prepared to look at that. I believe we are delivering real benefit – judge us on our output."

Are technical working groups the right structure?

"I think these people have genuine interest in making Ireland the best in animal health and we are deeply indebted to them.

"There are 76 people who give time and intellect effectively free to the farmers of Ireland as they strive to meet the goals of Animal Health Ireland and on behalf of the farmers of Ireland we are deeply indebted to them."

What should farmers have received from AHI?

"Over 2,000 farmers have attended 233 CellCheck workshops, 10 beef health check events, while over 500 farmers have received CellCheck awards in 2015 and 2016. These are some of our events on the ground for farmers as well as training vets for delivery. Over 6,000 farmers have attended CalfCare events, and over 27 technical bulletins have been produced.

"Remember, our national SCC was 270,000 cells/ml when we started, and now it is 190,000.

"Using Teagasc figures, this is worth €87m per year to farmers of Ireland. I’m proud of what is done and I’m convinced there is more we can deliver when we work together."

What is your procedure for recruiting a new CEO?

"We have initiated contact with a number of the best recruitment companies. Joe (O’Flaherty) was with us on secondment from the Department.

"The position will be open to Department personnel but also the industry. Joe has set AHI on a solid course. It is up to us and the new CEO to keep that going. The standard Joe set by chairing the implementation groups is extraordinary."

Will you stay on as AHI chair?

"It is my intention to at least stay on while we hire a new CEO and initiate a new Johne’s programme."

Is your board fit for purpose?

"We have great experience and skill but maybe we are lacking on the farming politics side. Board governance must be looked at to secure a solid foundation for the future. Up to now there has been no board impediment to delivery."

What’s your funding structure?

"We have €1.5m in funding each year and for that we must produce our work, run four programmes and three other national health specific projects."

What budget do you need?

"Depends on the scope and ambitions. Do we remain bovine-focused only? Do we touch projects like IBR that have very definite market access issues? And also do we coordinate significant vaccination programmes ongoing on farm?"

Read more

Full coverage: BVD