No increase in direct support for suckler and sheep farmers is a missed opportunity in addressing the ongoing decline in stock numbers, the Irish Natura and Hill Farmers Association (INHFA) has said.

INHFA vice president John Joe Fitzgerald expressed disappointment with the proposals announced in Budget 2026, describing the decision to flat-line supports as a concerning development.

"It indicates they are willing to accept declining numbers. This is an issue we will address with the minister as we seek commitments to protect and enhance both sectors which are also critical in supporting the wider rural economy," Fitzgerald said.

ADVERTISEMENT

With regard to the increased support in tackling rising levels of TB, the INHFA vice president stressed that the very high level of spending will need to deliver results.

"The €85m allocated is higher than the monies allocated under the Beef Welfare Scheme and over four times the allocation of the National Sheep Welfare Scheme," he said.

Carbon tax

On proposals around climate and biodiversity, Fitzgerald was scathing on the decision to increase carbon tax to €71/t and the immediate application of this increase on motor fuel.

This, he stated, isn’t just a direct attack on those living in rural areas, but will also increase production and travel costs that will impact our exports.

“At a time when competitors across the globe are looking to reduce costs, the decision to stay wedded to this ideology is a major cause of concern,” added the farm leader.

Fitzgerald also addressed the increased budget commitment of €209m for Climate Action and Environment Leadership Programme - with €82m of this targeted to a just transition for the midlands.

"It is important that we get clarity on how and where this money will be spent. This is critical because these initiatives are often sold as supporting climate and biodiversity, with the assumption that farmers are beneficiaries, while in reality they see little if any of the funding,” he said.

In concluding, the INHFA leader pointed to the increased allocation for the Infrastructure, Climate and Nature Fund and questioned if this funding is to support the implementation of the Nature Restoration Law. He also questioned whether there would be ring-fencing of monies inside this fund for the implementation of actions and costs resulting from the implementation of the law.