Geomembrane-lined lagoons are very popular on expanding dairy farms or greenfield sites that are being converted to large dairy enterprises. They are the least expensive option for storing slurry on farms. Like the other options, they come with a number of advantages and disadvantages that we have listed below.
Advantages of a lagoon
It is one of the more cost-effective options for storing large volumes of slurry.Once planning permission is obtained, installation should be very fast (some contractors claim installation can be achieved in two to three weeks).Slurry agitation is reasonably easy. Disadvantages of a lagoon
Planning permission for lagoons can be difficult to achieve in some county councils.Some sites are not suitable for lagoons (very rocky areas).A safety fence must be erected.Difficult to extend at a later date.Can gather a significant amount of rainwater.Farmers planning to install a lined slurry store (lagoon) through TAMS II must use a contractor from the approved Department list. The specifications for geomembrane-lined slurry stores is listed on the Department’s website under S126. The main specifications to note are:
A storage facility must be located not less than 50m from any water body in the case of new farmyards, and not less than 10m in the case of extensions or modifications to an existing facility.The banks of the store must be a minimum of 600mm high above ground level and be well-compacted.The slope angle should normally be 45°, but in certain soils the angle may be steeper. In no circumstance can the bank slope be steeper than 55°.The excavated and made-up ground must be finished uniform and smooth and free of any sharp protrusions.The anchor trench (which holds the liner in place and prevents it from slipping) must be carefully formed and compacted, and any undisturbed top soil beneath it must be removed.A leak detection system must be installed underneath the geomembrane lining.A proper agitation point(s) built to the specifications outlined in S126.Costs
Tables 1 and 2 outline the various capacities and costs associated with geomembrane lined stores. Table 1 is calculated for 16 weeks and Table 2 for 20 weeks. Other assumptions for both tables are a depth of 3.6m, freeboard of 0.3m and a rainfall figure of 23mm per week. The costs are calculated using the TAMS II reference costs for the construction of geomembrane-lined stores plus €54.7 per metre for the surrounding protective fence.
Table 3 outlines the costs of construction (provided by one contractor of geomembrane stores) of various sizes of these types of slurry stores. A list of all contractors (S126A) supplying geomembrane-lined stores is available on the DAFM website. The cost of channels or pipes for bringing slurry to the store is not included.
Looking at all the tables, the most notable feature is the benefit shown due to economies of scale. The bigger these storage systems are, the cheaper they are per m3 and per cow. Comparing Table 1 and Table 3, it appears that the TAMS II reference costs are lagging a little behind the contractor costs.
Geomembrane-lined lagoons are very popular on expanding dairy farms or greenfield sites that are being converted to large dairy enterprises. They are the least expensive option for storing slurry on farms. Like the other options, they come with a number of advantages and disadvantages that we have listed below.
Advantages of a lagoon
It is one of the more cost-effective options for storing large volumes of slurry.Once planning permission is obtained, installation should be very fast (some contractors claim installation can be achieved in two to three weeks).Slurry agitation is reasonably easy. Disadvantages of a lagoon
Planning permission for lagoons can be difficult to achieve in some county councils.Some sites are not suitable for lagoons (very rocky areas).A safety fence must be erected.Difficult to extend at a later date.Can gather a significant amount of rainwater.Farmers planning to install a lined slurry store (lagoon) through TAMS II must use a contractor from the approved Department list. The specifications for geomembrane-lined slurry stores is listed on the Department’s website under S126. The main specifications to note are:
A storage facility must be located not less than 50m from any water body in the case of new farmyards, and not less than 10m in the case of extensions or modifications to an existing facility.The banks of the store must be a minimum of 600mm high above ground level and be well-compacted.The slope angle should normally be 45°, but in certain soils the angle may be steeper. In no circumstance can the bank slope be steeper than 55°.The excavated and made-up ground must be finished uniform and smooth and free of any sharp protrusions.The anchor trench (which holds the liner in place and prevents it from slipping) must be carefully formed and compacted, and any undisturbed top soil beneath it must be removed.A leak detection system must be installed underneath the geomembrane lining.A proper agitation point(s) built to the specifications outlined in S126.Costs
Tables 1 and 2 outline the various capacities and costs associated with geomembrane lined stores. Table 1 is calculated for 16 weeks and Table 2 for 20 weeks. Other assumptions for both tables are a depth of 3.6m, freeboard of 0.3m and a rainfall figure of 23mm per week. The costs are calculated using the TAMS II reference costs for the construction of geomembrane-lined stores plus €54.7 per metre for the surrounding protective fence.
Table 3 outlines the costs of construction (provided by one contractor of geomembrane stores) of various sizes of these types of slurry stores. A list of all contractors (S126A) supplying geomembrane-lined stores is available on the DAFM website. The cost of channels or pipes for bringing slurry to the store is not included.
Looking at all the tables, the most notable feature is the benefit shown due to economies of scale. The bigger these storage systems are, the cheaper they are per m3 and per cow. Comparing Table 1 and Table 3, it appears that the TAMS II reference costs are lagging a little behind the contractor costs.
This is a subscriber-only article
SHARING OPTIONS: