In a recent landmark case against the Department of Agriculture, farmer Michael O'Connor was awarded entitlements held in penalties from what was described as a "procedurally flawed" inspection.
The Department of Agriculture is now contesting the verdict in the Court of Appeal. According to the official courts website, court papers were lodged on Tuesday.
ADVERTISEMENT
Criticism
In the High Court last July, Judge Michael White criticised the findings of the inspectors who carried out the inspection on the commonage land. "The court is faced with the situation that the inspection that led to the imposition of the SPS penalty was procedurally flawed and the legalities of this were not dealt with on review or on appeal," he ruled.
The judge ruled that the inspection was so "procedurally flawed" that the farmer should be entitled to his basic payment for his eligible land of 160.57ha in 2010, which comes to just over €124,000, but should not be paid any sum for the wrongly claimed commonage.
Mr O'Connor was also found to be liable for the 5% sanction imposed as a result of a separate cross-compliance check on his cattle.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the headline, summary and link below:
Title: Department to appeal against O'Connor case
In a recent landmark case against the Department of Agriculture, farmer Michael O'Connor was awarded entitlements held in penalties from what was described as a "procedurally flawed" inspection.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
The Department of Agriculture is now contesting the verdict in the Court of Appeal. According to the official courts website, court papers were lodged on Tuesday.
Criticism
In the High Court last July, Judge Michael White criticised the findings of the inspectors who carried out the inspection on the commonage land. "The court is faced with the situation that the inspection that led to the imposition of the SPS penalty was procedurally flawed and the legalities of this were not dealt with on review or on appeal," he ruled.
The judge ruled that the inspection was so "procedurally flawed" that the farmer should be entitled to his basic payment for his eligible land of 160.57ha in 2010, which comes to just over €124,000, but should not be paid any sum for the wrongly claimed commonage.
Mr O'Connor was also found to be liable for the 5% sanction imposed as a result of a separate cross-compliance check on his cattle.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS