Sign in to your account
Forgot / Reset Password? Click here
Not registered with Farmers Journal? Register now to read 7 Journal+ articles for FREE
Or

To redeem your unique loyalty code from the print edition click HERE
Just one final step...
You must confirm your email address by clicking on the link we’ve sent to your email address.
You are only one short step away from reading...
EU must get member states' approval for FTAs
Register below to read seven Journal+ articles
for free per month.
Or to redeem your unique loyalty code
from the print edition click HERE
Only takes a second!
Already registered with Farmers Journal? Sign in
By registering an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
code

EU must get member states' approval for FTAs

By on
According to a ruling from the EU Court of Justice, the Free Trade Agreement with Singapore must be approved by individual member states.
According to a ruling from the EU Court of Justice, the Free Trade Agreement with Singapore must be approved by individual member states.

The EU Court of Justice has ruled that the Free Trade Agreement with Singapore cannot be concluded by the European Union alone.

The EU and Singapore reached the deal in September 2013, one of the first of the ‘new generation’ bilateral deals. However the Commission requested an opinion from the Court of Justice as to whether the EU had exclusive competence in enabling it to conclude the deal by itself.

Evidence presented to the court showed that parts of the agreement fall within the competencies shared between the EU and member states. The court said that it follows that “the free trade agreement with Singapore can, as it stands, be concluded only by the European Union and member states acting together”.

In presenting its opinion, the court also said that this does not relate to whether the content of the agreement is compatible with EU law, only whether the EU had exclusive competence to conclude the deal.

There are two reasons for the ruling:

1. The EU does not have exclusive competence in non-direct foreign investment

2. Nor does it govern dispute settlement between investors and states.

Reaction

The ruling has received a positive reaction in Ireland. Fine Gael spokesman on EU affairs, Neale Richmond, has said that the decision must lead to more transparent trade deals.

“The post-Brexit trade deal is of vital importance to Ireland; it will now need to be agreed by all parliaments so it is vital that it is negotiated openly and that the myths are countered openly,” Richmond said. “Perhaps there is a role for the European Ombudsman in ensuring this.”

According to Sinn Fein MEP Matt Carthy this means Ireland must put the EU-Canada deal to a referendum.

“This reinforces the legal opinion I have received that outlines that a constitutional referendum will be required on the recently concluded EU-Canada trade agreement (CETA), due to the inclusion of the anti-democratic Investment Court proposal,” Carthy said. “As an immediate step the Irish Government must now immediately review its position on a referendum on the Canadian-EU trade agreement and specifically the inclusion of an Investment Court that would allow corporations sue governments for enacting progressive legislation, if it impacts on profits. All the evidence suggests that a referendum is required. The government shouldn’t have to be brought to court themselves in order for that referendum to be held.”

Read more

EU and Vietnam reach agreement on free trade deal

Bord Bia to open offices in Singapore and Warsaw

Related tags
Related Stories
West Cork, North Cork, Limerick & Clare.Contact Inspect 4...
All types of agricultural and residential doors. Call Pat for a free quote 029 6...
All types of agricultural roller doors. Grant approved....
FARMS MAINTAINED NATIONWIDE SEVICE FULLY INSURED ...