The Forest Service, which is part of the Department of Agriculture, decided to raise an overclaim in relation to a forestry grant. However, the man complained to the Ombudsman about it.
The man sold some of the land on which the grant was paid 18 years after the original grant application. The land was sold to the ESB for the construction of power lines. When the Department recalculated the amount payable to the man under the grant, it used a new digitised method to measure the land.
“Using this new method, the Department calculated that the man had over claimed the amount of land eligible for the grant in his original application,” Ombudsman Peter Tyndall said in his recently published Casebook. “This gave rise to an overpayment which the Department recouped back to the date of the original claim and charged interest by way of netting (withholding payments due) until the debt was repaid in full.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The Ombudsman established that the reduction in eligible land had not been calculated properly as the Department had not adjusted it to properly take account of the area of the plantation removed by the ESB.
The Department agreed to review its decision and revised it in line with the Ombudsman’s examination. The man was refunded the sum of €3,824.41 recouped by the Department.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
CODE NOT VALID
Please try again or contact support.
The Forest Service, which is part of the Department of Agriculture, decided to raise an overclaim in relation to a forestry grant. However, the man complained to the Ombudsman about it.
The man sold some of the land on which the grant was paid 18 years after the original grant application. The land was sold to the ESB for the construction of power lines. When the Department recalculated the amount payable to the man under the grant, it used a new digitised method to measure the land.
“Using this new method, the Department calculated that the man had over claimed the amount of land eligible for the grant in his original application,” Ombudsman Peter Tyndall said in his recently published Casebook. “This gave rise to an overpayment which the Department recouped back to the date of the original claim and charged interest by way of netting (withholding payments due) until the debt was repaid in full.”
The Ombudsman established that the reduction in eligible land had not been calculated properly as the Department had not adjusted it to properly take account of the area of the plantation removed by the ESB.
The Department agreed to review its decision and revised it in line with the Ombudsman’s examination. The man was refunded the sum of €3,824.41 recouped by the Department.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS