Last week we looked at the differing performance achieved by the top and bottom 10% of the 70 UK and Irish farms surveyed in Steven’s report. The report found that the top 10% were consistently achieving a higher scanning, calving and weaning percentage, as well as doing so in a shorter calving time frame – 9.5 weeks compared to 28 weeks (Table 1).
To dig down into the driving forces behind these figures, Steven looked at four major influential factors on farm: nutrition, genetics, housing/management and health.
Nutrition
Cow nutrition at certain times of the year is of critical importance to maintain productivity. Steven looked at nutrition pre-calving and the period between calving and the start of the breeding season. The majority of farms (64%) made pit silage, 14% made baled silage, 16% made a mixture of the two and just 6% made no silage at all. These farms were either out-wintering cows on deferred grazing or feeding hay or ammonia-treated straw. As there was no difference between the top and bottom 10%, with some of both groups feeding all types of fodder, Steven concluded that fodder type alone had no effect on performance.
Genetics
Table 2 looks at the weaning percentage, calving spread and heifer age at calving across the three main cow types. Herds using only continental crosses had poorer weaning figures and a more protracted calving spread. While native-cross cows achieved better figures than continental crosses, the mixture of native and continental breeds had the highest performance.
Steven also noted that some farms were using dairy-bred heifers from herds focusing on milk quality and cow longevity, using more traditional dairy breeds crossed to a beef breed. These were often cheaper to source and, due to high milk yield, are producing heavier calves at weaning. On cow breeds Steven concluded that cow type plays a key role in overall productivity and certain breeds are better suited to certain environments.
While certain breeds have a reputation for being harder to calve, across all the farms, once cow type was right, farmers were achieving a 90% weaning or better from a 10-week calving spread or less from all the breeds above.
The average weaning percentage of herds calving at two-years-old was 89%, with 62% of those farmers claiming to be profitable without subsidy. The average weaning percentage for those that calved heifers at three years old was 87%, with 64% of farms reporting they were not making a profit before subsidy.
Just 12 farms wintered cows outside. These farms averaged a weaning percentage of 90.6%. The remaining farms all housed cows for winter and, for herds that calved in 12 weeks or less, weaning percentages were 90.1% for bedded cattle, 86.5% for slats only and 86.7% for a mixture of both.
However, there is nothing in the data to suggest that a more mechanised method of feeding cows reduced losses. Just two of the top seven producers had mechanised systems while five of the bottom seven had.
Health
Steven concluded that there are many pieces to the farming jigsaw that some farms can be so focused on getting some aspects of the business right that others are often overlooked.
Good management, calving heifers at two years old, block calving, the correct type of cow and hybrid vigour are the main factors in achieving a good weaning percentage and better farm profits. While these are by no means new ideas or theories and have been discussed at farmer meeting through the years, still only 82% of cows in Scotland that are exposed to the bull wean a calf.
No farmer likes losing stock, no farmer puts cows to the bull hoping only some get pregnant, and no farmer wants unhealthy stock. Therefore, if we can increase the number of livestock sold each year by adapting the practices of the top-performing farms, it will lead to increased profit and job satisfaction. Farmers have the information and tools needed to make these changes. Often it’s a case of putting them all together at the same time.