Hypocrisy of some pesticide bans highlighted to EU Parliament
The double standard of banning pesticides in the EU but allowing the importation of food treated with them from outside the EU has been raised by Mairéad McGuinness.

The hypocrisy of banning certain plant pesticides in the EU only to import food from third countries treated with those products has been highlighted to the EU parliament.

Speaking in the EU parliament in Strasbourg yesterday, vice president Mairéad McGuinness said legislators must be wary of how they approach the subject.

She said: “We are not reassuring those who produce our food that we have them in mind when it comes to discussion and debates and legislation on plant protection products.”

She said that when MEPs talked of banning products without identifying what the alternatives were or what the consequences might be, it did not make them look like good legislators.

The specific issue of importing food into the EU where agrichemicals that are banned in the EU are used in their cultivation was raised.

An amendment addressing this issue was supported in the parliament and it asked that the approval process for products takes account of the double standard.

Inefficiencies

Focus was also placed on the inefficiencies that currently exist in EU legislation when it came to the approval of pesticide products.

McGuiness said: “Currently, member states can accept commercial products that have been approved in another member state with similar environmental conditions, but in practice this is not happening. Each member state is repeating the work and approval process due to a lack of trust between them.”

She said this was leading to a doubling up on work and delayed the approval of new agrichemicals and re-approval of existing ones. She added the increased pressure to reduce chemical use on crops sometimes lead to decisions being taken with full consideration or analysis of the consequences.

Replacements

She fully acknowledged that if a product was found to have any negative consequences to humans, animals or the environment then it must be taken off the market.

She did however emphasise that farmers would need replacement products or management techniques in their place.

"Fast tracking of products that are considered to be low-risk is also called for as is further innovation in this area," McGuinness concluded.

The farmer's daily wrap: inspections, milk price and silage 2019
Here is your news round-up of the five top farming stories and weather outlook for 16 February 2019.

Weather forecast

Met Éireann has said that there will be some mist or drizzle at times on Saturday morning, but most places will be dry during the day.

More general rain is forecast to develop along the west coast by evening.

It will be mild and breezy, with highs of 10°C to 12°C in southerly winds.

In the news

  • In pictures: silage 2019 kicks off in February in Kilkenny.
  • The board of Aurivo met on Friday and increased its January milk price.
  • Farmers are being driven out of business by over-zealous and unaccountable inspectors, Sinn Féin MEP Liadh Ní Riada has said.
  • Applications for the BEEP scheme, which has a funding provision of €20m, will be accepted up to and including next Friday 22 February.
  • Some 66 projects from across the country will be allocated funding of €62m under the €1bn rural regeneration and development fund.
  • Coming up this Saturday

  • Good week/bad week.
  • Nathan Tuffy reports from Balla Mart.
    Farmers driven out of business by over-zealous inspectors – Ní Riada
    The next CAP must include substantial reform of the current inspection system which is unfair and needlessly aggressive, according to MEP Liadh Ní Riada.

    Farmers are being driven out of business by over-zealous and unaccountable inspectors, Sinn Féin MEP Liadh Ní Riada has said.

    On Friday, the Ireland South MEP said the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) must include substantial reform of the current inspection system, which she says is unfair and needlessly aggressive.

    Regulation

    “I meet farmers all over the country and no matter where I go one of the first things they want to talk about are inspections.

    “There seems to be no regulation or protocol for these inspections, at least none that is being adhered to.

    People who have found themselves singled out for intensive investigation because they dared to appeal a decision

    “I've talked to people who have been given 10 minutes notice before an inspection, been penalised for things they weren't there to inspect and people who have found themselves singled out for intensive investigation because they dared to appeal a decision,” she said.

    Ní Riada said that there seems to be zero accountability of inspectors either.

    Living in dread

    “Farmers live in dread wondering what kind of mood the inspector will be in when they arrive.

    "Furthermore, when they do find an issue, rather than giving them a time frame to correct it, they are penalised on the spot with a cut in their Single Farm Payment (SFP) [Basic Payment Scheme (BPS)].

    “Given the SFP [BPS] is the only thing just about keeping their heads above water, it is simply unacceptable that such a drastic penalty can be imposed with the flick of a wrist, with no accountability, based on one person's mood.

    “These are not just the complaints of a few people angry they have been penalised.

    "In 2015, over 10,000 farmers had to appeal penalties, often for minor easily-corrected breaches,” she said.

    Criteria

    The Sinn Féin MEP said that criteria needs to be urgently put in place at EU and national level to relieve farmers from this often unnecessary stress.

    “Sinn Féín has proposed that we use a yellow card system to ensure that farmers who commit first-time minor offices do not lose payments.

    The assessment must take into account any external contributing factors beyond the farmer's control

    “If a farmer is to be penalised, the assessment must take into account any external contributing factors beyond the farmer's control and the economic situation of the farmer.

    “Inspections should be limited to a maximum of 1% of farmers and, more importantly, farmers should be chosen based on the severity of the risk they pose due to their type or volume of produce.

    Inspections are important

    “Inspections are important to ensure we maintain our high standard of quality and the great reputation Irish produce has around the world.

    "However, over-zealous unaccountable inspectors engaging in what amounts to little more than ambushes do not do that.

    “The Department of Agriculture, and in particular Minister Creed, should be ashamed of themselves for fomenting the sense of tension and worry that currently hangs over our primary producers,” she said.

    Read more

    More green conditions in next CAP

    60% surge in farmers facing penalties

    The five most common cross-compliance problems

    Majority of Irish MEPs fail to back free trade deal with Singapore
    Irish exports to Singapore are valued at €863m and it is a buyer of whey and milk powder.

    Just three out of Ireland's 11 Member of European Parliament (MEPs) voted in favour of a proposed free trade agreement between the EU and Singapore this week.

    Mairead McGuinness, Sean Kelly and Deirdre Clune voted for the recently finalised deal on Wednesday this week.

    Matt Carthy and Luke Ming Flanagan voted against the deal. Marian Harkin and Nessa Childers abstained, while there were no recorded votes for the others.

    Passed

    Overall, the vote was passed by the European Parliament, with 425 votes in favour, 186 votes against and 41 abstentions.

    Ireland currently exports milk powder and whey to Singapore, among other things.

    Figures from the European Commission show that Irish exports to Singapore are valued at €683m, while imports are valued at €467m.

    Bilateral deals

    The trade and investment agreements with Singapore are the EU's first completed bilateral deals with a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).

    Within ASEAN, Singapore is by far the EU's largest partner, with a total bilateral trade in goods of €53.3bn (2017) and in services of €44.4bn (2016).

    Middle income class and average incomes have risen by 66.4% in the past 10 years

    Singapore is both a city and a country.

    While Ireland is 101 times bigger than Singapore, the population of Singapore is 1.2 times larger than Ireland and so relies quite heavily on imported foods.

    Middle income class and average incomes have risen by 66.4% in the past 10 years.

    Singapore is within the top 15 in the world for value of imports, importing a value shy of €6.8bn for food and live animals in 2017.

    The free trade agreement aims to:

  • Remove nearly all customs duties and get rid of overlapping bureaucracy.
  • Improve trade for goods like electronics, food products and pharmaceuticals.
  • Stimulate green growth, remove trade obstacles for green tech and create opportunities for environmental services.
  • Encourage EU companies to invest more in Singapore and Singaporean companies to invest more in the EU.
  • Important agreement

    “This is an important agreement that will boost our trade with the most important of the ASEAN economies and is a stepping stone towards a wider trading agreement with the entire region,” Fine Gael’s European Parliament spokesman on international trade Sean Kelly MEP said.

    “This agreement makes it easier for EU firms of all sizes to export to Singapore.

    "It eliminates customs duties, facilitates regional and global value changes, and removes technical and non-tariff barriers to trade.”

    Kelly concluded by calling on the European Council to follow parliament's lead and approve the agreement as soon as possible.

    Read more

    Northwest Ireland to southeast Asia