The record will show 2017 will go down as a very good year for milk price. While peak milk was in full flow, commodity prices were good and dairy farmers benefited. The exact opposite was at play in 2016. An average price of close to 36c/litre for 2017 is in stark contrast to the 27c/litre average paid out for 2016 milk.
In our review this year, similar to last year, we are presenting a more complete package of results. No longer is it good enough to look at milk prices in isolation. We report on the required farmer investment in their co-op (share-up), co-op profitability (what the accounts say) and milk prices paid out. All three combine to form a foundation for sustainable dairy farm returns.
While it is late in the year (mid 2018) to be reviewing 2017 results, so far we have found it is only possible to complete this work after all annual accounts have been published and KPMG has reviewed all information presented by each processor. The Irish Farmers Journal/KPMG Milk Price Review is simply the money paid out for all manufacturing milk supplied in the calendar year divided by total litres supplied – all milk-based payments included. It is this simplicity that is key to the understanding of how the review is calculated, regardless of peak-to-trough ratios, winter milk schemes etc.
With greater complexity of pricing systems, the Irish Farmers Journal/KPMG Milk Price Review is now more important than ever to provide clarity to farmers. Milk price is ranked on net price paid after deduction of levies and charges as this is the fairest comparison. Most manufacturing milk processed in the Republic is included in the review, but some co-ops such as Boherbue and North Cork remain outside the review. Conditional somatic cell count bonuses are included in the payout, as are premiums paid for better fat and protein in milk. Hence, processors with higher quality and better milk solids will rank higher. Processors with fixed milk price schemes can win or lose between years depending on the fixed milk price payments in place. It is important to say that providing the option for farmers to avail of fixed price offering is a good service to suppliers, especially those farmers that carry a high debt level, to help manage volatility.
No liquid milk
In recent years, a significant change was made to the definition. This ensured that no liquid milk was included. The definition was changed to milk “purchased for and used in manufacturing”. This has prevented liquid milk bought at a higher price (eg Glanbia, Arrabawn or Aurivo) being included in the manufacturing milk price review. Winter milk is included in the review and, while it normally attains a higher value, it is produced at a higher cost to the farmer. Our colour coding and percentage winter milk in total supply is included to help differentiate summer pools from winter.
Additional information
As dairy businesses have evolved, we have presented more detailed information in the coverage around the review to help understanding. Additions include the peak-to-trough ratio, milk solids payment and graphical illustration of the per-cow difference in milk value. We detail share-up requirements and a review of the financial performance of the business to flesh out the bigger picture so farmers can better understand what is happening with their local business.
Read more
Milk price review: Lisavaird holds top spot for 2017
Milk price review: ranking tweaked when compared on milk solids
Milk price review: share-up differs between processors
Financial health of the dairy processors
Empire fate building – Ireland's dairy industry
The record will show 2017 will go down as a very good year for milk price. While peak milk was in full flow, commodity prices were good and dairy farmers benefited. The exact opposite was at play in 2016. An average price of close to 36c/litre for 2017 is in stark contrast to the 27c/litre average paid out for 2016 milk.
In our review this year, similar to last year, we are presenting a more complete package of results. No longer is it good enough to look at milk prices in isolation. We report on the required farmer investment in their co-op (share-up), co-op profitability (what the accounts say) and milk prices paid out. All three combine to form a foundation for sustainable dairy farm returns.
While it is late in the year (mid 2018) to be reviewing 2017 results, so far we have found it is only possible to complete this work after all annual accounts have been published and KPMG has reviewed all information presented by each processor. The Irish Farmers Journal/KPMG Milk Price Review is simply the money paid out for all manufacturing milk supplied in the calendar year divided by total litres supplied – all milk-based payments included. It is this simplicity that is key to the understanding of how the review is calculated, regardless of peak-to-trough ratios, winter milk schemes etc.
With greater complexity of pricing systems, the Irish Farmers Journal/KPMG Milk Price Review is now more important than ever to provide clarity to farmers. Milk price is ranked on net price paid after deduction of levies and charges as this is the fairest comparison. Most manufacturing milk processed in the Republic is included in the review, but some co-ops such as Boherbue and North Cork remain outside the review. Conditional somatic cell count bonuses are included in the payout, as are premiums paid for better fat and protein in milk. Hence, processors with higher quality and better milk solids will rank higher. Processors with fixed milk price schemes can win or lose between years depending on the fixed milk price payments in place. It is important to say that providing the option for farmers to avail of fixed price offering is a good service to suppliers, especially those farmers that carry a high debt level, to help manage volatility.
No liquid milk
In recent years, a significant change was made to the definition. This ensured that no liquid milk was included. The definition was changed to milk “purchased for and used in manufacturing”. This has prevented liquid milk bought at a higher price (eg Glanbia, Arrabawn or Aurivo) being included in the manufacturing milk price review. Winter milk is included in the review and, while it normally attains a higher value, it is produced at a higher cost to the farmer. Our colour coding and percentage winter milk in total supply is included to help differentiate summer pools from winter.
Additional information
As dairy businesses have evolved, we have presented more detailed information in the coverage around the review to help understanding. Additions include the peak-to-trough ratio, milk solids payment and graphical illustration of the per-cow difference in milk value. We detail share-up requirements and a review of the financial performance of the business to flesh out the bigger picture so farmers can better understand what is happening with their local business.
Read more
Milk price review: Lisavaird holds top spot for 2017
Milk price review: ranking tweaked when compared on milk solids
Milk price review: share-up differs between processors
Financial health of the dairy processors
Empire fate building – Ireland's dairy industry
This is a subscriber-only article
SHARING OPTIONS: