This week’s vote by the European Parliament to extend proposals for 2030 emissions targets is an example of replacing what could be achieved with an idealistic dream. If this follows through into EU policy, Ireland will find itself in the unforgivable position of having made the same mistake twice by buying into targets that had no hope of being met.
That is what happened by accepting a 20% reduction as our 2020 target, which reflected the idealistic Green Party politics of the 2007-2011 Government. Our failure to achieve beyond an expected 5% of this should be a warning. The Commission got it right by suggesting we start from an average of 2016-2018 emissions and build on that. By saying we should carry forward the unrealistic target we have and recalibrate the starting point to 2018 is just to prepare for future failure to deliver – and with it a cost in excess of €1bn.
The IFA president in a hard-hitting letter to the ministers responsible for agriculture and climate has captured the unwarranted burden this places on Ireland and agriculture in particular. Transport and buildings are two areas where proper investment can deliver real returns.
ADVERTISEMENT
Agriculture must do what it can but the EU has to be realistic in what gains can be made in livestock production. Environmentally efficient food production models should be supported and not curtailed.
Gary Lanigan outlines the comprehensive work carried out by Teagasc in this area here.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
CODE NOT VALID
Please try again or contact support.
This week’s vote by the European Parliament to extend proposals for 2030 emissions targets is an example of replacing what could be achieved with an idealistic dream. If this follows through into EU policy, Ireland will find itself in the unforgivable position of having made the same mistake twice by buying into targets that had no hope of being met.
That is what happened by accepting a 20% reduction as our 2020 target, which reflected the idealistic Green Party politics of the 2007-2011 Government. Our failure to achieve beyond an expected 5% of this should be a warning. The Commission got it right by suggesting we start from an average of 2016-2018 emissions and build on that. By saying we should carry forward the unrealistic target we have and recalibrate the starting point to 2018 is just to prepare for future failure to deliver – and with it a cost in excess of €1bn.
The IFA president in a hard-hitting letter to the ministers responsible for agriculture and climate has captured the unwarranted burden this places on Ireland and agriculture in particular. Transport and buildings are two areas where proper investment can deliver real returns.
Agriculture must do what it can but the EU has to be realistic in what gains can be made in livestock production. Environmentally efficient food production models should be supported and not curtailed.
Gary Lanigan outlines the comprehensive work carried out by Teagasc in this area here.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS