"Will protected urea products that meet Irish fertiliser regulations, but do not meet the 660ppm level, be similarly as effective?" - Philip Cosgrave, Yara Ireland
I feel it is important to raise the following questions on the purchase of protected urea products, on which I hope someone will be in a position to advise.
Are all protected urea products on the market as effective environmentally and agronomically?
ADVERTISEMENT
Many of the products have not been tested in Ireland comprehensively, or have been tested for their agronomic impact but not on emissions lowering performance.
Should fertiliser companies be forced to state the type of inhibitor used on their protected urea products? Should they have to declare the application rate and date and even a use-by-date to guarantee efficacy?
It is my understanding that inhibitors, once applied to urea or urea and sulphur products, begin to break down. Therefore, knowing the initial application rate of inhibitor on the product is important to ensure there is enough active inhibitor present to be effective when field applied.
Irish regulations require a minimum level of 414 ppm of the inhibitor NBPT to be applied on urea. However, research carried out by Teagasc in 2013 and 2014 used a protected urea with 660ppm. Will protected urea products that meet Irish regulations, but do not meet the 660ppm level, be as effective? It is a complicated topic.
I’m sure many would appreciate the extra guidance and clarification.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
CODE NOT VALID
Please try again or contact support.
DEAR SIR
I feel it is important to raise the following questions on the purchase of protected urea products, on which I hope someone will be in a position to advise.
Are all protected urea products on the market as effective environmentally and agronomically?
Many of the products have not been tested in Ireland comprehensively, or have been tested for their agronomic impact but not on emissions lowering performance.
Should fertiliser companies be forced to state the type of inhibitor used on their protected urea products? Should they have to declare the application rate and date and even a use-by-date to guarantee efficacy?
It is my understanding that inhibitors, once applied to urea or urea and sulphur products, begin to break down. Therefore, knowing the initial application rate of inhibitor on the product is important to ensure there is enough active inhibitor present to be effective when field applied.
Irish regulations require a minimum level of 414 ppm of the inhibitor NBPT to be applied on urea. However, research carried out by Teagasc in 2013 and 2014 used a protected urea with 660ppm. Will protected urea products that meet Irish regulations, but do not meet the 660ppm level, be as effective? It is a complicated topic.
I’m sure many would appreciate the extra guidance and clarification.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS