"Is there a credible economist who can stand over the assertion that farmers should not have choice in the matter of cattle tag supply?" - Patrick Kent, President, ICSA.
DEAR SIR: Derek Deane sees vested interests in the ending of monopoly for cattle tags (IFJ letters, 6 August) whereas most economists would see monopoly as the typical outcome of vested interests influencing a market. He tries to make the bizarre case that monopoly is in the best interest of the consumer when it comes to cattle tags. What school of economics supports this notion? Is there a credible economist who can stand over the assertion that farmers should not have choice in the matter of cattle tag supply?
It is as if someone was to object, twenty years ago, to Ryanair getting up and running on the basis that consumers couldn’t afford to carry the cost of Michael O’Leary buying another fleet of airlines when Aer Lingus had a perfectly good fleet already. Unlike air travel, the costs of multiple suppliers is a few computers, a bit of software and a few extra phone lines. In terms of cost to the farmer, two staff in two companies is much the same cost as four staff in one company. There may actually be greater efficiencies in terms of keeping staff gainfully employed in existing sheep tag companies. In fairness to Mullinahone, they have been careful to avoid fleecing customers and have provided an efficient service. If they continue to do this, they have little to fear from competition.
ADVERTISEMENT
However, in the interests of openness and transparency I want to state very clearly that ICSA has been fully in favour of competition for tags. We believe that this is the best way to ensure that there is ongoing product development and ongoing pressure to cut costs so that farmers get the best deal. Apart from the cost of buying the tags for new calves, farmers also face cost in terms of having to pay for replacements and the risk of penalties associated with missing tags.
The best way of ensuring that farmers’ interests are protected is to have choice and then we can decide for ourselves the best option in terms of price, quality or service and which tag delivers the lowest loss rates.
Register for free to read this story and our free stories.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the headline, summary and link below:
Title: Letter re cattle tag contract - choice needed
"Is there a credible economist who can stand over the assertion that farmers should not have choice in the matter of cattle tag supply?" - Patrick Kent, President, ICSA.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
CODE NOT VALID
Please try again or contact support.
Patrick Kent, president, ICSA
DEAR SIR: Derek Deane sees vested interests in the ending of monopoly for cattle tags (IFJ letters, 6 August) whereas most economists would see monopoly as the typical outcome of vested interests influencing a market. He tries to make the bizarre case that monopoly is in the best interest of the consumer when it comes to cattle tags. What school of economics supports this notion? Is there a credible economist who can stand over the assertion that farmers should not have choice in the matter of cattle tag supply?
It is as if someone was to object, twenty years ago, to Ryanair getting up and running on the basis that consumers couldn’t afford to carry the cost of Michael O’Leary buying another fleet of airlines when Aer Lingus had a perfectly good fleet already. Unlike air travel, the costs of multiple suppliers is a few computers, a bit of software and a few extra phone lines. In terms of cost to the farmer, two staff in two companies is much the same cost as four staff in one company. There may actually be greater efficiencies in terms of keeping staff gainfully employed in existing sheep tag companies. In fairness to Mullinahone, they have been careful to avoid fleecing customers and have provided an efficient service. If they continue to do this, they have little to fear from competition.
However, in the interests of openness and transparency I want to state very clearly that ICSA has been fully in favour of competition for tags. We believe that this is the best way to ensure that there is ongoing product development and ongoing pressure to cut costs so that farmers get the best deal. Apart from the cost of buying the tags for new calves, farmers also face cost in terms of having to pay for replacements and the risk of penalties associated with missing tags.
The best way of ensuring that farmers’ interests are protected is to have choice and then we can decide for ourselves the best option in terms of price, quality or service and which tag delivers the lowest loss rates.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS