In general, Ireland has managed the COVID-19 pandemic well. While Australia and New Zealand won plaudits initially for the hardline stance of closing borders tightly, it is clear they paid insufficient attention to what a well-administered vaccination programme could contribute. Ireland and the EU did not make that mistake, but Ireland had an extra advantage, in that the public has a high trust in good science and accept the views of well qualified people when they give honest assurances of the worth of vaccination and the very small risk associated with almost every medical treatment, including vaccination.
Farmers are probably among the sections of society most at ease with the concept of vaccination, as it is a routine feature in both sheep and cattle husbandry, as well as in pigs and horses. The public has also been tolerant of having to produce a vaccination certificate and identification when they go into a restaurant or board an aircraft. They accept that it is for the greater good that rules – which some might regard as restrictive – are universally applied. One of the outstanding anomalies is in the workplace, where you would imagine the need for rules would be most obvious. It is striking that while restaurants insist on proof of vaccination, employers are forbidden to do so. This seems to me to lack both logic and common sense.
It’s now accepted that regardless of “blended“ working conditions, it is important that people can go to where their work colleagues and employers are based. To say that it breaches data protection rules for an individual to be queried on their vaccination status when there is a virus that is so contagious and so virulent that colleagues are placed in danger seems to me to be sacrificing legitimate public health concerns for some theoretical individual rights to privacy. Few rights are absolute in this particular case. If the Data Commissioner is interpreting the law correctly, the law needs to be changed. If she is interpreting it incorrectly, she needs to either revise her advice or resign. The inconsistency is too great and too serious to be ignored.
ADVERTISEMENT
Register for free to read this story and our free stories.
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
CODE NOT VALID
Please try again or contact support.
In general, Ireland has managed the COVID-19 pandemic well. While Australia and New Zealand won plaudits initially for the hardline stance of closing borders tightly, it is clear they paid insufficient attention to what a well-administered vaccination programme could contribute. Ireland and the EU did not make that mistake, but Ireland had an extra advantage, in that the public has a high trust in good science and accept the views of well qualified people when they give honest assurances of the worth of vaccination and the very small risk associated with almost every medical treatment, including vaccination.
Farmers are probably among the sections of society most at ease with the concept of vaccination, as it is a routine feature in both sheep and cattle husbandry, as well as in pigs and horses. The public has also been tolerant of having to produce a vaccination certificate and identification when they go into a restaurant or board an aircraft. They accept that it is for the greater good that rules – which some might regard as restrictive – are universally applied. One of the outstanding anomalies is in the workplace, where you would imagine the need for rules would be most obvious. It is striking that while restaurants insist on proof of vaccination, employers are forbidden to do so. This seems to me to lack both logic and common sense.
It’s now accepted that regardless of “blended“ working conditions, it is important that people can go to where their work colleagues and employers are based. To say that it breaches data protection rules for an individual to be queried on their vaccination status when there is a virus that is so contagious and so virulent that colleagues are placed in danger seems to me to be sacrificing legitimate public health concerns for some theoretical individual rights to privacy. Few rights are absolute in this particular case. If the Data Commissioner is interpreting the law correctly, the law needs to be changed. If she is interpreting it incorrectly, she needs to either revise her advice or resign. The inconsistency is too great and too serious to be ignored.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS