Hopes Turkish live export market could reopen soon
Following a visit from Turkish cattle importers to Ireland, the IFA are hopefully the market will reopen to live exports later in the year.

There are hopes that the Turkish live export market will reopen soon, which would provide a boost to weanling sales in the second half of the year.

Last week, Turkish cattle importers, facilitated by the IFA, visited farms, marts and exporters in Ireland. Meetings were held with the Department of Agriculture and Bord Bia along with high-level technical discussions between the Turkish Meat and Milk Board and the Department.

Turkish importers and Irish exporters were both strongly of the view that trade should reopen later this year according to Angus Woods, IFA’s livestock chair.

Competition

Woods said some Irish exporters were in Turkey this week and reopening the market would be essential for price competition and putting a price under weanlings.

Following a shipment of young bulls to Turkey two weeks ago, Woods said: “It is hoped further shipments with the same people involved will take place again very soon. This importer already has licences to import live cattle.”

In 2018, 30,562 weanlings and stores, mainly young bulls were exported to Turkey. The high quality and high health status of Irish cattle was well recognised by Turkish farmers and importers according to Woods which created major potential for Irish exports.

Read more

Turkish officials meet Creed on animal and semen exports

In pictures: weanling bulls sail for Turkey

Mercosur deal would shatter EU climate change credentials - ICMSA
ICMSA's Pat McCormack has called for the removal of any additional access to the EU market for beef from Mercosur.

The credibility of the European Commission as a leader in tackling climate change would be “shattered” if a trade dead is concluded with Mercosur allowing additional beef into the EU.

That is according to Pat McCormack, president of the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), who said such an agreement would be a disaster for farmers and the environment.

EU beef, specifically Irish beef, had a far superior environmental footprint than South American beef, McCormack said. In addition, European farmers were being challenged daily to further improve their footprint on the back of pressure and regulation form the EU Commission.

Policy

McCormack said farmers were extremely angry at the contradictions in EU policy: “On one hand, we have more regulation on an almost constant basis being imposed on EU farmers at huge financial and farm management cost and without the marketplace returning an extra cent for their efforts.

“On the other hand, the EU now appears to be prepared to allow additional access for Mercosur beef into the EU market with absolutely no environment or climate change commitments.”

He pointed to low-cost imports meeting much lower standards as one of the reasons food prices were at unsustainability low and unrealistic levels.

“Is the EU prepared to sell out its farm families and global climate change for big business? As of now, the answer would appear to be ‘yes’,” McCormack stated bluntly.

Standards

If farmers in the EU had to meet certain standards then those same standards must be imposed on imports also, he said.

McCormack called on the Government to vigorously oppose the Mercosur deal and seek the removal any additional access for beef from the negotiating table and build-in environment and climate change commitments for existing access.

“They have to do that if they are to be fair to their own farmers and in the interests of the environment”, he concluded.

Read more

Better dairy beef genetics must secure a better price - ICMSA

Appeal for vigilance on rural roads during upcoming silage period

Listen: farmers' expectations from €100m beef scheme
We continue to talk to farmers to get their reaction to the €100m fund and to see where they would like the money to go.

John O’Leary (finisher), Gorey, Co Wexford

I’d like to see it on all of 2018 and all of 2019, on the cattle that have been finished and slaughtered in the factories.

It should be distributed in this particular way because the finishing man is taking the risk of buying the stores.

Suckler and store farmers will benefit from better prices in the mart: once the finishers get the subsidy, they’ll be out buying.

The factories are the ones holding the price back a bit.

Even though they claim that’s the market prices, I believe our price should be a little bit more.

The factories would cut the price as much as they can, and they’ll eventually cut it more now simply because of the extra €100m coming from the EU and the Government.

Con Frawley (drystock and sheep), Curraghmore, Co Tipperary

I think farmers need to get a lot more information about this money before we can comment on how good or bad it is.

I’d like to see it going to the smaller farms this time and not into the hands of the big feedlots and finishers.

It’s been an extremely tough winter and spring for anyone who was finishing cattle.

I know beef prices are coming up a bit, but now lamb prices have taken an awful hit – it’s one blow after another.

Con Frawley, Curraghmore, Co Tipperary. \ Matthew Halpin

Additional reporting by Matthew Halpin.

Read more

€100m beef fund for sucklers and finishers – Creed

€100m autumn payout to beef farmers – Creed

Brexit beef fund: the options

Brexit beef compensation: what farmer groups want

Farmer viewpoint: how the €100m beef fund should be paid and to who

Farmer viewpoint: how the €100m beef fund should be paid and to who
Farmers at Nenagh mart, Ballina mart and the Teagasc dairy beef open day in Johnstown Castle outlined what they want from the Brexit beef compensation fund.

Michael and Ornagh Darcy

Calf to store Piercestown, Co Wexford

“That money will go straight into the hands of the factories and the feedlots. A proportion of the cattle is in feedlots and it will be just another tool for the factories, whereas it should go to the family farms.

“The people finishing the cattle are getting them cheaper. If we’re serious about protecting the beef industry, they have to target the family farm.”

John Dunne at the Teagasc dairy beef open day in Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford. \ Thomas Hubert

John Dunne

Suckler and calf to beef Portarlington, Co Offaly

“I think it should go directly to the finisher. The beef man was never one to hold on to money. He will bring it straight to the mart and send it back down along the line to the store or weanling producer.

“It’s the family farm that needs the support, not the factories that own feedlots or the feedlot operator, they have cashflow. There should be a limit on the number of cattle or the amount for each farmer. Giving everybody a little amount of money is purely a vote-getting exercise.”

John Gleeson, at Nenagh Mart.

John Gleeson

Suckler and drystock Puckaun, Co Tipperary

“The money is just an election gimmick if you ask me. I’d be afraid it’s going to be like the Single Farm Payment and all the schemes that we have; 80% of the money going to 20% of the farmers.

“It’s always the smaller farmers, like myself, who are getting the raw deal – the weak are getting weaker. I’d like to see the smaller farms given preference with this fund to give them a chance.”

Joe Cahill, Cloughjordan, Co Tipperary, at Nenagh Mart.

Joe Cahill

Suckler and drystock Cloughjordan, Co Tipperary

“Personally, I’d love to see it coming as a payment per suckler cow because I think if the suckler cow isn’t supported, we will all be left rearing dairy stock in a few years.

“Unfortunately, at the moment it looks like most of the money will end up in the hands of the big finishers. At the same time, we have to remember that a lot of the trade in the marts depends on one or two of those big buyers standing around the ring.”

Michael Mitchell, Castlebar, Co Mayo. \ Frank Dolan.

Michael Mitchell

Suckler to weanling/beef Castlebar, Co Mayo

“It should go to both finishers and to suckler farmers. Both are feeling a lot of pain since Brexit started to bite. The fairest way to pay it to cattle finishers is as a payment per kilo of beef sold since last autumn.

“To make the pot go as far is it can, the payment should be capped either up to a weight like 380kg or 400kg or a maximum per head. Where the farmer is bringing them to slaughter, they should receive a higher payment per animal than those that buy cattle to finish.”

John Morahan, Kilmaine, Co Mayo. \ Conor McKeown

John Morahan

Suckler to beef Kilmaine, Co Mayo

“Factory feedlots should not qualify for any of the fund because of how they are used to control the market. The fund should be backdated to cover cattle slaughtered from the autumn onwards when price pressure started.

“The fairest way to pay it is on a payment per head, with higher payments for cattle slaughtered at higher carcase weights, as these cattle are the ones hit the hardest by lower prices and tougher price cuts. It probably should be capped at a 500kg carcase.”

Read more

Hogan secures €100m fund for beef farmers

€100m beef package 'in the next couple of months' – Taoiseach

Brexit compensation fund must be delivered to farmers by end of July – ICSA

Department to decide what farmers are eligible for €100m Brexit fund

€100m fund distribution ‘must be fair to all producers’ in beef chain